User Survey for Textbender Beta

This is an informal survey to determine the level and nature of interest among potential users of textbender, toward a planned beta version. The survey is directed at creative writers and poets of all skill levels, and anyone who is interested in experimental, new media. Below are the premises and the question:

The good part of textbender is the medium of recombinant text. It promises benefits for poets and writers, from engaging in critical dialogue, to contributing to new forms of art. For a list of benefits, please see:
http://reluk.ca/project/textbender/d/benefits.xht

For a more general overview of recombinant text, please see:
http://reluk.ca/project/textbender/d/overview.xht

The bad part is the current implementation. Textbender is still primitive, and the medium will be a challenge for writers to work in. The beta will be almost as primitive as the alpha version shown here: http://reluk.ca/var/cache/textbender-demo/textbender/a/b/demo/instructions.xht

And the question, assuming that the planned beta were developed:

Would you be inclined to participate as a beta user?

Why? (In a word or two, what do you like or dislike about it?)

The survey was posted to the forums below. Responses are tabulated as of July 11, 2007.

Elite Skills

Poetry and writing workshop

One respondant ‘intrigued’, but no definite answer was given.

Literature and Latte

A place for readers, writers, coffee drinkers and tautologies; also the home of Scrivener for Mac OS X
Yes, interesting. Independant revision lines, vs. Wiki. AmberV No, too early in development. mamster

The thread presenting the survey was viewed 374 times.

WritingForums.com

Discussion forum for writers and poets
Yes.1 silvermander No.1 Jack_Carter
Yes.1 teflon No, dislikes collaborative writing. Mike C

The thread was viewed 181 times.

writingforums.org

Discussion forum for writers and poets

No response. The thread was viewed 37 times.

Writing and the Digital Life

Mailing list that explores the impact of digital technologies upon writing and lived experience
Yes, likes it, ‘at first glance’. Cynthia B. Rubin No, too difficult to use. David Inkey
Yes, it is collaborative. Jeremy Hight No, until easier to use. Joanna Howard

The list had 258 subscribers.

Summary and Conclusion

The respondants were split; 5 answering ‘yes’ to beta participation, 5 answering ‘no’.2 The results indicate that some artists, at least, would be inclined to participate in the proposed beta, despite a primitive implementation.

The frequency of positive responses was higher than expected. It suggests that some artists might also be inclined to participate earlier than beta. To test this possibility, the project has now been opened to artists (and to other participants as well). For anyone who is interested, please see: http://reluk.ca/project/textbender/contributors.xht

Notes

1.

These respondants answered yes or no in the click-poll, but did not post a reason.

2.

Not all of the responses were a definite ‘yes’ or ‘no’. In the tabulation of results, I interpret any strong expression of interest or disinterest as a definite answer.

administrator Michael Allan
textbender